Icelandic Glacial vs Saratoga
Side-by-side comparison based on independent COA lab data.
95
Icelandic Glacial
Spring water
vs
95
Saratoga
Spring water
Icelandic Glacial
Saratoga
95
COA Purity Score
95
169
Analytes Tested
134
1 / 105
Contaminants Detected
1 / 89
0
Exceedances
0
Physical Properties
8.1
pH
N/A
N/A
TDS (mg/L)
N/A
Spring
Source Type
Spring
Key Contaminants
Not detected
PFAS
Not detected
Not tested
Microplastics
Not tested
All clear
Heavy Metals
All clear
Top Minerals
80 mg/L
Solids Total Dissolved
N/A
30 mg CaCO3/L
Alkalinity as CaCO3
N/A
29.7 mg CaCO3/L
Bicarbonate
N/A
22 mg CaCO3/L
Hardness, Total
N/A
13 mg/L
Chloride
24.5 mg/L
10 mg/L
Sodium
13.7 mg/L
5.4 mg/L
Calcium
18.6 mg/L
3 mg/L
Sulfate as SO4
N/A
Testing Coverage
17/17 ND
Heavy Metals
16/17 ND
29/29 ND
Volatile Organic Compounds
22/22 ND
29/30 ND
Pesticides & Herbicides
27/27 ND
6/6 ND
Radiological Contaminants
2/2 ND
12/12 ND
Disinfection Byproducts
6/6 ND
11/11 ND
PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)
15/15 ND
Comparison based on independent laboratory COA data. Scores reflect purity (percentage of contaminant analytes not detected), bonuses for PFAS/microplastics/heavy metals testing, and penalties for limit exceedances. All data from third-party lab reports.