Acqua Panna vs Saratoga
Side-by-side comparison based on independent COA lab data.
78
Acqua Panna
Mineral water
vs
95
Saratoga
Spring water
Acqua Panna
Saratoga
78
COA Purity Score
95
60
Analytes Tested
134
4 / 35
Contaminants Detected
1 / 89
0
Exceedances
0
Physical Properties
7.7
pH
N/A
N/A
TDS (mg/L)
N/A
Spring
Source Type
Spring
Key Contaminants
Not tested
PFAS
Not detected
Detected
Microplastics
Not tested
All clear
Heavy Metals
All clear
Top Minerals
170 umhos/cm
Conductivity
N/A
85.6 mg/L
Alkalinity (as CaCO3)
N/A
70.06 mg/L
Hardness (Total)
N/A
18.4 mg/L
Calcium
18.6 mg/L
7.55 mg/L
Sodium
13.7 mg/L
3.19 mg/L
Chloride
24.5 mg/L
0.39 mg/L
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
N/A
0.134 mg/L
Nitrate (as N)
N/A
Testing Coverage
9/11 ND
Heavy Metals
16/17 ND
16/16 ND
Volatile Organic Compounds
22/22 ND
1/1 ND
Pesticides & Herbicides
27/27 ND
0/1 ND
Radiological Contaminants
2/2 ND
3/3 ND
Disinfection Byproducts
6/6 ND
2/3 ND
Microplastics
Not tested
Not tested
PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)
15/15 ND
More comparisons
Comparison based on independent laboratory COA data. Scores reflect purity (percentage of contaminant analytes not detected), bonuses for PFAS/microplastics/heavy metals testing, and penalties for limit exceedances. All data from third-party lab reports.